Demographics details for Schenectady, NY vs Thomaston, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Schenectady, NY vs Thomaston, GA.
Data | Schenectady | Thomaston |
---|---|---|
Population | 68,809 | 9,858 |
Median Age | 36.0 years | 36.7 years |
Median Income | $54,650 | $30,298 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 28% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Schenectady vs Thomaston
- In Schenectady, the population is higher at 68,809, compared to 9,858 in Thomaston.
- The median age in Thomaston is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 36.0 years in Schenectady.
- Schenectady has a higher median income of $54,650 compared to $30,298 in Thomaston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Schenectady at 28.0% compared to 23.0% in Thomaston.
- The poverty level is higher in Thomaston at 28%, compared to 13% in Schenectady.
- The unemployment rate in Schenectady is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.2% in Thomaston.
Demographics
Demographics Schenectady vs Thomaston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Schenectady | Thomaston |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 38 |
White | 47 | 56 |
Asian | 7 | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Schenectady vs Thomaston
- In Thomaston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 20% in Schenectady.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Thomaston at 56% compared to 47% in Schenectady.
- The Asian population is larger in Schenectady at 7% compared to 1% in Thomaston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Schenectady at 12% compared to 3% in Thomaston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Schenectady at 13% compared to 2% in Thomaston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Schenectady at 1% compared to 0% in Thomaston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Schenectady | Thomaston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 14.6% |
Depression | 24.0% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 22.7% | 22.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 39.6% | 39.8% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Schenectady vs Thomaston
- In Thomaston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.4% in Schenectady.
- Depression is more prevalent in Schenectady at 24.0% compared to 22.4% in Thomaston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Schenectady at 22.7% compared to 22.2% in Thomaston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Schenectady at 16.2% compared to 13.9% in Thomaston.
- Thomaston has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 39.6% in Schenectady.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Thomaston at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Schenectady.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Schenectady | Thomaston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (1,194) | 2.7% (264) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (10,540) | 14.9% (1,473) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (10,146) | 13.3% (1,308) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (10,303) | 11.7% (1,153) |
Education Levels Comparison: Schenectady vs Thomaston
- In Thomaston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.7% in Schenectady.
- A higher percentage of residents in Schenectady hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Thomaston.
- More residents in Schenectady have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 13.3% in Thomaston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Schenectady hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 11.7% in Thomaston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.