Environment details: Scandia KS
acceptable quality; few improvements advised.
Environment details: Sutherland VA
Water quality acceptable; testing shows few issues.
Compare Environment: Scandia KS vs Sutherland VA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Scandia | Sutherland |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 478 | 784 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | acceptable quality; few improvements advised. | Water quality acceptable; testing shows few issues. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.7 | 1.57 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 22 | 28 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Scandia vs Sutherland
- Both cities report the same water quality at 6/10.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Scandia at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Sutherland.
- The average air quality index is worse in Scandia with 1.7 compared to 1.57 in Sutherland.
- Sutherland experiences more days with poor air quality at 28 compared to 22 in Scandia.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.