Demographics details for Scandia, KS vs San francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Scandia, KS vs San francisco, CA.

Data Scandia San francisco
Population 338 808,437
Median Age 48.6 years 39.3 years
Median Income $49,219 $136,689
Married Families 34.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.6

Population Comparison: Scandia vs San francisco

  • The population in San francisco is higher at 808,437, compared to 338 in Scandia.
  • Residents in Scandia have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 39.3 years in San francisco.
  • San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689, compared to $49,219 in Scandia.
  • In San francisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Scandia.
  • Scandia has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in San francisco.
  • San francisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.4% in Scandia.

Demographics

Demographics Scandia vs San francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Scandia San francisco
Black 1 5
White 90 31
Asian Data is updating 37
Hispanic Data is updating 16
Two or More Races 9 10
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Scandia vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Scandia.
  • Scandia has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 31% in San francisco.
  • In San francisco, the Asian population stands at 37%, greater than 0% in Scandia.
  • San francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 0% in Scandia.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San francisco at 10%, compared to 9% in Scandia.
  • In San francisco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Scandia.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Scandia San francisco
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 8.4%
Depression 20.9% 15.7%
Smoking 16.9% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 20.3% 16.4%
Obesity 37.5% 19.1%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Scandia vs San francisco

  • More residents in Scandia report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Scandia at 20.9% compared to 15.7% in San francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Scandia at 16.9% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Scandia at 20.3% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Scandia at 37.5% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Scandia at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in San francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Scandia San francisco
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.0% (23,928)
High School Diploma 14.5% (49) 8.5% (68,418)
Less than High School 10.7% (36) 12.4% (99,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.6% (63) 50.3% (406,774)

Education Levels Comparison: Scandia vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Scandia.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Scandia hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San francisco at 12.4%, compared to 10.7% in Scandia.
  • In San francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 18.6% in Scandia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.