Demographics details for Sayreville, NJ vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sayreville, NJ vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Sayreville | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 45,123 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $95,250 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sayreville vs Fairburn
- In Sayreville, the population is higher at 45,123, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- Residents in Sayreville have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Sayreville has a higher median income of $95,250 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sayreville at 43.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 7% in Sayreville.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Sayreville.
Demographics
Demographics Sayreville vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sayreville | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 73 |
| White | 41 | 12 |
| Asian | 17 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sayreville vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 13% in Sayreville.
- Sayreville has a higher percentage of White residents at 41% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Sayreville at 17% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sayreville at 20% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sayreville at 9% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sayreville and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sayreville | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 19.4% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 12.8% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 29.7% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sayreville vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.9% in Sayreville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sayreville at 19.4% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 12.8% in Sayreville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 14.8% in Sayreville.
- Fairburn has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 29.7% in Sayreville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sayreville at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sayreville | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (311) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 18.0% (8,105) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (4,385) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.3% (12,297) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sayreville vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Sayreville have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sayreville hold a high school diploma at 18.0% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- More residents in Sayreville have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sayreville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.