Demographics details for Savage, MN vs South haven, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Savage, MN vs South haven, MI.
| Data | Savage | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,893 | 3,988 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 61.0 years |
| Median Income | $123,069 | $63,202 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Savage vs South haven
- In Savage, the population is higher at 32,893, compared to 3,988 in South haven.
- The median age in South haven is higher at 61.0 years, compared to 37.5 years in Savage.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069 compared to $63,202 in South haven.
- In South haven, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 47.0% in Savage.
- The poverty level is higher in South haven at 12%, compared to 4% in Savage.
- South haven has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Savage.
Demographics
Demographics Savage vs South haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Savage | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 11 |
| White | 74 | 74 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Savage vs South haven
- In South haven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 9% in Savage.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Savage and South haven at 74%.
- The Asian population is larger in Savage at 7% compared to 1% in South haven.
- South haven has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South haven at 7%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- In South haven, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Savage.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Savage | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.5% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Savage vs South haven
- In South haven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 12.1% in Savage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South haven at 24.3% versus 20.5% in Savage.
- South haven has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 12.0% in Savage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Savage at 18.9% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
- South haven has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 32.4% in Savage.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South haven at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Savage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Savage | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (303) | 1.2% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,949) | 16.0% (638) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (1,095) | 11.5% (457) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.5% (11,339) | 32.1% (1,279) |
Education Levels Comparison: Savage vs South haven
- In South haven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Savage.
- In South haven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South haven at 11.5%, compared to 3.3% in Savage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.5% compared to 32.1% in South haven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.