Demographics details for Savage, MN vs Monett, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Savage, MN vs Monett, MO.
| Data | Savage | Monett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,893 | 9,789 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $123,069 | $42,635 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Savage vs Monett
- In Savage, the population is higher at 32,893, compared to 9,789 in Monett.
- Residents in Savage have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 34.7 years in Monett.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069 compared to $42,635 in Monett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Savage at 47.0% compared to 33.0% in Monett.
- The poverty level is higher in Monett at 15%, compared to 4% in Savage.
- Monett has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.3% in Savage.
Demographics
Demographics Savage vs Monett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Savage | Monett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 51 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Savage vs Monett
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Savage at 9% compared to 0% in Monett.
- Savage has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 51% in Monett.
- The Asian population is larger in Savage at 7% compared to 2% in Monett.
- Monett has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Monett at 15%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- In Monett, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Savage.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Savage | Monett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.5% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Savage vs Monett
- In Monett, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 12.1% in Savage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Monett at 25.3% versus 20.5% in Savage.
- Monett has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 12.0% in Savage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Savage at 18.9% compared to 16.5% in Monett.
- Monett has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 32.4% in Savage.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Monett at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Savage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Savage | Monett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (303) | 1.0% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,949) | 20.5% (2,003) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (1,095) | 20.0% (1,953) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.5% (11,339) | 8.4% (822) |
Education Levels Comparison: Savage vs Monett
- In Monett, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Savage.
- In Monett, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 9.0% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Monett at 20.0%, compared to 3.3% in Savage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.5% compared to 8.4% in Monett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.