Demographics details for Savage, MN vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Savage, MN vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Savage | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,893 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $123,069 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Savage vs Loves park
- In Savage, the population is higher at 32,893, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- Residents in Savage have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Savage at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- The poverty level is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 4% in Savage.
- Loves park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.3% in Savage.
Demographics
Demographics Savage vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Savage | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 7 |
| White | 74 | 71 |
| Asian | 7 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Savage vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Savage at 9% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- Savage has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- The Asian population is larger in Savage at 7% compared to 3% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Savage and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Savage | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.5% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Savage vs Loves park
- In Loves park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 12.1% in Savage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Loves park at 21.3% versus 20.5% in Savage.
- Loves park has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Savage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Savage at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 32.4% in Savage.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Savage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Savage | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (303) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,949) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (1,095) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.5% (11,339) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Savage vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 9.0% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loves park at 9.7%, compared to 3.3% in Savage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.5% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.