Demographics details for Savage, MN vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Savage, MN vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Savage | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,893 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $123,069 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Savage vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 32,893 in Savage.
- Residents in Savage have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069 compared to $71,367 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Savage at 47.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 4% in Savage.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 3.3% in Savage.
Demographics
Demographics Savage vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Savage | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 21 |
| White | 74 | 10 |
| Asian | 7 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Savage vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 9% in Savage.
- Savage has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Savage at 7% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Savage.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Savage | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.5% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Savage vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 12.1% in Savage.
- Depression is more prevalent in Savage at 20.5% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 12.0% in Savage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Savage at 18.9% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 32.4% in Savage.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Savage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Savage | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (303) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,949) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (1,095) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.5% (11,339) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Savage vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.9% in Savage.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 9.0% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 3.3% in Savage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.5% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.