Demographics details for Savage, MN vs Keiser, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Savage, MN vs Keiser, AR.
Data | Savage | Keiser |
---|---|---|
Population | 32,893 | 713 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $123,069 | $50,136 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Savage vs Keiser
- In Savage, the population is higher at 32,893, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- The median age in Keiser is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 37.5 years in Savage.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069 compared to $50,136 in Keiser.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Savage at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Keiser.
- The poverty level is higher in Keiser at 12%, compared to 4% in Savage.
- Keiser has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Savage.
Demographics
Demographics Savage vs Keiser provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Savage | Keiser |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 4 |
White | 74 | 83 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Savage vs Keiser
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Savage at 9% compared to 4% in Keiser.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keiser at 83% compared to 74% in Savage.
- The Asian population is larger in Savage at 7% compared to 0% in Keiser.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Savage at 5% compared to 1% in Keiser.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keiser at 12%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Savage and Keiser at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Savage | Keiser |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.5% | 14.6% |
Depression | 20.5% | 28.9% |
Smoking | 12.0% | 24.9% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 34.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Savage vs Keiser
- In Keiser, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 12.1% in Savage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keiser at 28.9% versus 20.5% in Savage.
- Keiser has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 12.0% in Savage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Savage at 18.9% compared to 15.2% in Keiser.
- Keiser has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 32.4% in Savage.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 7.0% in Savage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Savage | Keiser |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (303) | 6.2% (44) |
High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,949) | 15.0% (107) |
Less than High School | 3.3% (1,095) | 55.5% (396) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.5% (11,339) | 7.3% (52) |
Education Levels Comparison: Savage vs Keiser
- In Keiser, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.9% in Savage.
- In Keiser, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keiser at 55.5%, compared to 3.3% in Savage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.5% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.