Demographics details for Savage, MN vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Savage, MN vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Savage | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,893 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $123,069 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Savage vs Cleburne
- The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 32,893 in Savage.
- Residents in Savage have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069 compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Savage at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 4% in Savage.
- Cleburne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.3% in Savage.
Demographics
Demographics Savage vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Savage | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 6 |
| White | 74 | 52 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Savage vs Cleburne
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Savage at 9% compared to 6% in Cleburne.
- Savage has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- The Asian population is larger in Savage at 7% compared to 1% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 5% in Savage.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Savage.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Savage | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.5% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Savage vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 12.1% in Savage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cleburne at 23.6% versus 20.5% in Savage.
- Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Savage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Savage at 18.9% compared to 17.9% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 32.4% in Savage.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleburne at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Savage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Savage | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (303) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,949) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (1,095) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.5% (11,339) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Savage vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Savage.
- In Cleburne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 9.0% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 3.3% in Savage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.5% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.