Demographics details for Savage, MN vs Camp hill, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Savage, MN vs Camp hill, PA.
| Data | Savage | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,893 | 8,204 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $123,069 | $104,959 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Savage vs Camp hill
- In Savage, the population is higher at 32,893, compared to 8,204 in Camp hill.
- The median age in Camp hill is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 37.5 years in Savage.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069 compared to $104,959 in Camp hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Savage at 47.0% compared to 44.0% in Camp hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Camp hill at 5%, compared to 4% in Savage.
- Camp hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.3% in Savage.
Demographics
Demographics Savage vs Camp hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Savage | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 2 |
| White | 74 | 82 |
| Asian | 7 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Savage vs Camp hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Savage at 9% compared to 2% in Camp hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Camp hill at 82% compared to 74% in Savage.
- The Asian population is larger in Savage at 7% compared to 6% in Camp hill.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Savage and Camp hill at 5%.
- Both Savage and Camp hill have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Savage and Camp hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Savage | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.5% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 28.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Savage vs Camp hill
- In Camp hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 12.1% in Savage.
- Depression is more prevalent in Savage at 20.5% compared to 20.4% in Camp hill.
- Camp hill has a higher smoking rate at 12.8% compared to 12.0% in Savage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Savage at 18.9% compared to 17.3% in Camp hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Savage at 32.4% compared to 28.8% in Camp hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Camp hill at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Savage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Savage | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (303) | 0.6% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,949) | 9.2% (756) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (1,095) | 4.6% (381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.5% (11,339) | 41.3% (3,388) |
Education Levels Comparison: Savage vs Camp hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Camp hill.
- In Camp hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.2% compared to 9.0% in Savage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Camp hill at 4.6%, compared to 3.3% in Savage.
- In Camp hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.3% compared to 34.5% in Savage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.