Demographics details for Savage, MN vs Brooklyn, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Savage, MN vs Brooklyn, CT.
| Data | Savage | Brooklyn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,893 | 8,244 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $123,069 | $80,945 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | Data is updating |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Savage vs Brooklyn
- In Savage, the population is higher at 32,893, compared to 8,244 in Brooklyn.
- The median age in Brooklyn is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 37.5 years in Savage.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069 compared to $80,945 in Brooklyn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Savage at 47.0% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- The poverty level is higher in Brooklyn at 6%, compared to 4% in Savage.
- The unemployment rate in Savage is higher at 3.3%, compared to 2.5% in Brooklyn.
Demographics
Demographics Savage vs Brooklyn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Savage | Brooklyn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 100 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Savage vs Brooklyn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Savage at 9% compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brooklyn at 100% compared to 74% in Savage.
- The Asian population is larger in Savage at 7% compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Savage at 5% compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Savage at 5% compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Savage and Brooklyn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Savage | Brooklyn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 20.5% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Savage vs Brooklyn
- More residents in Savage report poor mental health at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Savage at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Savage at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Savage at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Savage at 32.4% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Savage at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Savage | Brooklyn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (303) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,949) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (1,095) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.5% (11,339) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Savage vs Brooklyn
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage hold a high school diploma at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- More residents in Savage have less than a high school education at 3.3% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Savage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.5% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.