Demographics details for Saucier, MS vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Saucier, MS vs Tacoma, WA.
Data | Saucier | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,199 | 221,776 |
Median Age | 41.3 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $67,742 | $79,085 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Saucier vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 1,199 in Saucier.
- Residents in Saucier have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $67,742 in Saucier.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 32.0% in Saucier.
- The poverty level is identical in both Saucier and Tacoma at 11%.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.2% in Saucier.
Demographics
Demographics Saucier vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Saucier | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 11 |
White | 100 | 53 |
Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Saucier vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- Saucier has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Saucier.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Saucier.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 0% in Saucier.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Saucier.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Saucier | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 11.9% |
Depression | 25.6% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 22.9% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 34.0% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Saucier vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.0% in Saucier.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 25.6% in Saucier.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Saucier at 22.9% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Saucier at 16.3% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 34.0% in Saucier.
- Disability percentages are higher in Saucier at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Tacoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Saucier | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (3,474) |
High School Diploma | 29.9% (359) | 14.2% (31,504) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (76) | 10.1% (22,501) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (84) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Saucier vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Saucier.
- A higher percentage of residents in Saucier hold a high school diploma at 29.9% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 6.3% in Saucier.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 7.0% in Saucier.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.