Demographics details for Saucier, MS vs Clemmons, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Saucier, MS vs Clemmons, NC.
Data | Saucier | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,199 | 21,823 |
Median Age | 41.3 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $67,742 | $75,667 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Saucier vs Clemmons
- The population in Clemmons is higher at 21,823, compared to 1,199 in Saucier.
- The median age in Clemmons is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 41.3 years in Saucier.
- Clemmons has a higher median income of $75,667, compared to $67,742 in Saucier.
- In Clemmons, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Saucier.
- Saucier has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Clemmons.
- The unemployment rate in Saucier is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Clemmons.
Demographics
Demographics Saucier vs Clemmons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Saucier | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 6 |
White | 100 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Saucier vs Clemmons
- In Clemmons, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- Saucier has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 76% in Clemmons.
- In Clemmons, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Saucier.
- Clemmons has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Saucier.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clemmons at 6%, compared to 0% in Saucier.
- In Clemmons, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Saucier.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Saucier | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 13.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 8.8% |
Depression | 25.6% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 22.9% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 34.0% | 29.7% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Saucier vs Clemmons
- More residents in Saucier report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.9% in Clemmons.
- Depression is more prevalent in Saucier at 25.6% compared to 23.7% in Clemmons.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Saucier at 22.9% compared to 12.5% in Clemmons.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clemmons at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in Saucier.
- Obesity rates are higher in Saucier at 34.0% compared to 29.7% in Clemmons.
- Disability percentages are higher in Saucier at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Clemmons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Saucier | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (140) |
High School Diploma | 29.9% (359) | 9.3% (2,040) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (76) | 6.5% (1,429) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (84) | 34.0% (7,418) |
Education Levels Comparison: Saucier vs Clemmons
- In Clemmons, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Saucier.
- A higher percentage of residents in Saucier hold a high school diploma at 29.9% compared to 9.3% in Clemmons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clemmons at 6.5%, compared to 6.3% in Saucier.
- In Clemmons, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.0% compared to 7.0% in Saucier.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.