Demographics details for Saratoga, CA vs Woodstock, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Saratoga, CA vs Woodstock, IL.
Data | Saratoga | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,903 | 25,665 |
Median Age | 50.9 years | 36.3 years |
Median Income | $237,730 | $82,287 |
Married Families | 60.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Saratoga vs Woodstock
- In Saratoga, the population is higher at 29,903, compared to 25,665 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Saratoga have a higher median age of 50.9 years compared to 36.3 years in Woodstock.
- Saratoga has a higher median income of $237,730 compared to $82,287 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Saratoga at 60.0% compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodstock at 8%, compared to 0% in Saratoga.
- Woodstock has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.4% in Saratoga.
Demographics
Demographics Saratoga vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Saratoga | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 36 | 59 |
Asian | 57 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Saratoga vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 59% compared to 36% in Saratoga.
- The Asian population is larger in Saratoga at 57% compared to 2% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 2% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 13%, compared to 5% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Saratoga and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Saratoga | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 10.6% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 5.9% | 10.7% |
Depression | 13.5% | 20.2% |
Smoking | 5.3% | 15.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 15.7% | 32.4% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Saratoga vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 10.6% in Saratoga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 20.2% versus 13.5% in Saratoga.
- Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 5.3% in Saratoga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 14.0% in Saratoga.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 32.4% compared to 15.7% in Saratoga.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Saratoga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Saratoga | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (163) | 0.9% (237) |
High School Diploma | 3.8% (1,134) | 15.8% (4,047) |
Less than High School | 2.9% (865) | 12.9% (3,314) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 61.9% (18,517) | 21.0% (5,381) |
Education Levels Comparison: Saratoga vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Saratoga.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 3.8% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 12.9%, compared to 2.9% in Saratoga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 61.9% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.