Demographics details for Saratoga, CA vs Union, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Saratoga, CA vs Union, OR.
| Data | Saratoga | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,903 | 26,177 |
| Median Age | 50.9 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $237,730 | $61,946 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Saratoga vs Union
- In Saratoga, the population is higher at 29,903, compared to 26,177 in Union.
- Residents in Saratoga have a higher median age of 50.9 years compared to 39.7 years in Union.
- Saratoga has a higher median income of $237,730 compared to $61,946 in Union.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Saratoga at 60.0% compared to 42.0% in Union.
- The poverty level is higher in Union at 11%, compared to 0% in Saratoga.
- The unemployment rate in Saratoga is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.2% in Union.
Demographics
Demographics Saratoga vs Union provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Saratoga | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 36 | 88 |
| Asian | 57 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Saratoga vs Union
- In Union, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union at 88% compared to 36% in Saratoga.
- The Asian population is larger in Saratoga at 57% compared to 1% in Union.
- Union has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Saratoga.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Saratoga at 5% compared to 4% in Union.
- In Union, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Saratoga.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Saratoga | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 10.6% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 5.9% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 13.5% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 5.3% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 15.7% | 35.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Saratoga vs Union
- In Union, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 10.6% in Saratoga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union at 27.8% versus 13.5% in Saratoga.
- Union has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 5.3% in Saratoga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Union at 17.8% compared to 14.0% in Saratoga.
- Union has higher obesity rates at 35.4% compared to 15.7% in Saratoga.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Saratoga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Saratoga | Union |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (163) | 0.6% (146) |
| High School Diploma | 3.8% (1,134) | 18.6% (4,878) |
| Less than High School | 2.9% (865) | 9.1% (2,380) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 61.9% (18,517) | 16.0% (4,194) |
Education Levels Comparison: Saratoga vs Union
- In Union, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Saratoga.
- In Union, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 3.8% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union at 9.1%, compared to 2.9% in Saratoga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 61.9% compared to 16.0% in Union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.