Demographics details for Saratoga, CA vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Saratoga, CA vs South jordan, UT.
Data | Saratoga | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,903 | 83,513 |
Median Age | 50.9 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $237,730 | $119,822 |
Married Families | 60.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Saratoga vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 29,903 in Saratoga.
- Residents in Saratoga have a higher median age of 50.9 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- Saratoga has a higher median income of $237,730 compared to $119,822 in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Saratoga at 60.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
- The poverty level is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 0% in Saratoga.
- The unemployment rate in Saratoga is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Saratoga vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Saratoga | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 36 | 83 |
Asian | 57 | 4 |
Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Saratoga vs South jordan
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Saratoga and South jordan at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 36% in Saratoga.
- The Asian population is larger in Saratoga at 57% compared to 4% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Saratoga.
- Both Saratoga and South jordan have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Saratoga.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Saratoga | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 10.6% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 5.9% | 9.0% |
Depression | 13.5% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 5.3% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 15.7% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Saratoga vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 10.6% in Saratoga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 13.5% in Saratoga.
- South jordan has a higher smoking rate at 7.3% compared to 5.3% in Saratoga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 14.0% in Saratoga.
- South jordan has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 15.7% in Saratoga.
- Disability percentages are higher in Saratoga at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Saratoga | South jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (163) | 0.2% (172) |
High School Diploma | 3.8% (1,134) | 8.4% (6,995) |
Less than High School | 2.9% (865) | 2.7% (2,236) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 61.9% (18,517) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Saratoga vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.4% compared to 3.8% in Saratoga.
- More residents in Saratoga have less than a high school education at 2.9% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 61.9% compared to 27.1% in South jordan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.