Demographics details for Saratoga, CA vs Lawrence, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Saratoga, CA vs Lawrence, MA.
Data | Saratoga | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,903 | 87,954 |
Median Age | 50.9 years | 31.5 years |
Median Income | $237,730 | $53,977 |
Married Families | 60.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Saratoga vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 87,954, compared to 29,903 in Saratoga.
- Residents in Saratoga have a higher median age of 50.9 years compared to 31.5 years in Lawrence.
- Saratoga has a higher median income of $237,730 compared to $53,977 in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Saratoga at 60.0% compared to 26.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is higher in Lawrence at 15%, compared to 0% in Saratoga.
- Lawrence has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 4.4% in Saratoga.
Demographics
Demographics Saratoga vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Saratoga | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 36 | -4 |
Asian | 57 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 82 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Saratoga vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Saratoga.
- Saratoga has a higher percentage of White residents at 36% compared to -4% in Lawrence.
- The Asian population is larger in Saratoga at 57% compared to 2% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 82%, compared to 2% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 15%, compared to 5% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Saratoga and Lawrence at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Saratoga | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 10.6% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 5.9% | 14.2% |
Depression | 13.5% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 5.3% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 15.7% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Saratoga vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 10.6% in Saratoga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lawrence at 22.4% versus 13.5% in Saratoga.
- Lawrence has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 5.3% in Saratoga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 14.5% compared to 14.0% in Saratoga.
- Lawrence has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 15.7% in Saratoga.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lawrence at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Saratoga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Saratoga | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (163) | 2.7% (2,366) |
High School Diploma | 3.8% (1,134) | 18.6% (16,316) |
Less than High School | 2.9% (865) | 34.1% (29,963) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 61.9% (18,517) | 9.2% (8,067) |
Education Levels Comparison: Saratoga vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in Saratoga.
- In Lawrence, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 3.8% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lawrence at 34.1%, compared to 2.9% in Saratoga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 61.9% compared to 9.2% in Lawrence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.