Demographics details for Saratoga springs, NY vs Sherwood, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Saratoga springs, NY vs Sherwood, MI.

Data Saratoga springs Sherwood
Population 28,593 286
Median Age 41.8 years 34.3 years
Median Income $97,241 $53,092
Married Families 40.0% 61.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 4.5

Population Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Sherwood

  • In Saratoga springs, the population is higher at 28,593, compared to 286 in Sherwood.
  • Residents in Saratoga springs have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 34.3 years in Sherwood.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher median income of $97,241 compared to $53,092 in Sherwood.
  • In Sherwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 40.0% in Saratoga springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sherwood at 8%, compared to 6% in Saratoga springs.
  • Sherwood has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.3% in Saratoga springs.

Demographics

Demographics Saratoga springs vs Sherwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Saratoga springs Sherwood
Black 3 Data is updating
White 86 92
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 1
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Sherwood

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Saratoga springs at 3% compared to 0% in Sherwood.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sherwood at 92% compared to 86% in Saratoga springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Saratoga springs at 3% compared to 0% in Sherwood.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Saratoga springs at 4% compared to 1% in Sherwood.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sherwood at 6%, compared to 4% in Saratoga springs.
  • In Sherwood, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Saratoga springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Saratoga springs Sherwood
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.2% 12.2%
Depression 20.8% 25.7%
Smoking 13.2% 21.8%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 18.4%
Obesity 28.4% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Sherwood

  • In Sherwood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 13.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sherwood at 25.7% versus 20.8% in Saratoga springs.
  • Sherwood has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 13.2% in Saratoga springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Saratoga springs at 21.5% compared to 18.4% in Sherwood.
  • Sherwood has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 28.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sherwood at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Saratoga springs Sherwood
No Schooling 0.7% (208) 2.1% (6)
High School Diploma 11.0% (3,147) 39.2% (112)
Less than High School 6.3% (1,801) 45.1% (129)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.3% (12,109) 2.4% (7)

Education Levels Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Sherwood

  • In Sherwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Saratoga springs.
  • In Sherwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sherwood at 45.1%, compared to 6.3% in Saratoga springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.3% compared to 2.4% in Sherwood.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.