Demographics details for Saratoga springs, NY vs Parker, SD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Saratoga springs, NY vs Parker, SD.

Data Saratoga springs Parker
Population 28,593 1,221
Median Age 41.8 years 39.3 years
Median Income $97,241 $83,864
Married Families 40.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 6% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 2.0

Population Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Parker

  • In Saratoga springs, the population is higher at 28,593, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
  • Residents in Saratoga springs have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 39.3 years in Parker.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher median income of $97,241 compared to $83,864 in Parker.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Saratoga springs at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Parker.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Parker.
  • The unemployment rate in Saratoga springs is higher at 3.3%, compared to 2.0% in Parker.

Demographics

Demographics Saratoga springs vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Saratoga springs Parker
Black 3 4
White 86 85
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 5
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Parker

  • In Parker, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Saratoga springs.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 85% in Parker.
  • The Asian population is larger in Saratoga springs at 3% compared to 0% in Parker.
  • Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Both Saratoga springs and Parker have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • In Parker, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Saratoga springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Saratoga springs Parker
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 13.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.2% 9.0%
Depression 20.8% 17.8%
Smoking 13.2% 16.4%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 20.4%
Obesity 28.4% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Parker

  • In Parker, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.5% compared to 13.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Saratoga springs at 20.8% compared to 17.8% in Parker.
  • Parker has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 13.2% in Saratoga springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Saratoga springs at 21.5% compared to 20.4% in Parker.
  • Parker has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 28.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Saratoga springs at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Saratoga springs Parker
No Schooling 0.7% (208) 0.2% (3)
High School Diploma 11.0% (3,147) 17.9% (218)
Less than High School 6.3% (1,801) 13.0% (159)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.3% (12,109) 12.9% (158)

Education Levels Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Parker

  • A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
  • In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 13.0%, compared to 6.3% in Saratoga springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.3% compared to 12.9% in Parker.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.