Demographics details for Saratoga springs, NY vs Gordon, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Saratoga springs, NY vs Gordon, GA.
| Data | Saratoga springs | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,593 | 58,954 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $97,241 | $57,555 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Gordon
- The population in Gordon is higher at 58,954, compared to 28,593 in Saratoga springs.
- Residents in Saratoga springs have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 39.1 years in Gordon.
- Saratoga springs has a higher median income of $97,241 compared to $57,555 in Gordon.
- In Gordon, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 40.0% in Saratoga springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Gordon at 20%, compared to 6% in Saratoga springs.
- Gordon has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.3% in Saratoga springs.
Demographics
Demographics Saratoga springs vs Gordon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Saratoga springs | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 86 | 71 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Gordon
- In Gordon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Saratoga springs.
- Saratoga springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 71% in Gordon.
- The Asian population is larger in Saratoga springs at 3% compared to 1% in Gordon.
- Gordon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 4% in Saratoga springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gordon at 6%, compared to 4% in Saratoga springs.
- In Gordon, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Saratoga springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Saratoga springs | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Gordon
- In Gordon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.4% in Saratoga springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gordon at 23.1% versus 20.8% in Saratoga springs.
- Gordon has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 13.2% in Saratoga springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Saratoga springs at 21.5% compared to 15.7% in Gordon.
- Gordon has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 28.4% in Saratoga springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gordon at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Saratoga springs | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (208) | 1.6% (918) |
| High School Diploma | 11.0% (3,147) | 17.8% (10,497) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,801) | 28.5% (16,793) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.3% (12,109) | 11.1% (6,523) |
Education Levels Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Gordon
- In Gordon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Saratoga springs.
- In Gordon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gordon at 28.5%, compared to 6.3% in Saratoga springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.3% compared to 11.1% in Gordon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.