Demographics details for Saratoga springs, NY vs Brookings, SD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Saratoga springs, NY vs Brookings, SD.

Data Saratoga springs Brookings
Population 28,593 23,993
Median Age 41.8 years 24.5 years
Median Income $97,241 $57,824
Married Families 40.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 2.3

Population Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Brookings

  • In Saratoga springs, the population is higher at 28,593, compared to 23,993 in Brookings.
  • Residents in Saratoga springs have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 24.5 years in Brookings.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher median income of $97,241 compared to $57,824 in Brookings.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Saratoga springs at 40.0% compared to 27.0% in Brookings.
  • The poverty level is higher in Brookings at 12%, compared to 6% in Saratoga springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Saratoga springs is higher at 3.3%, compared to 2.3% in Brookings.

Demographics

Demographics Saratoga springs vs Brookings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Saratoga springs Brookings
Black 3 2
White 86 84
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 4 4
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Brookings

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Saratoga springs at 3% compared to 2% in Brookings.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 84% in Brookings.
  • In Brookings, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Saratoga springs.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Saratoga springs and Brookings at 4%.
  • Both Saratoga springs and Brookings have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • In Brookings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Saratoga springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Saratoga springs Brookings
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 12.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.2% 8.7%
Depression 20.8% 18.7%
Smoking 13.2% 14.9%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 20.5%
Obesity 28.4% 34.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Brookings

  • More residents in Saratoga springs report poor mental health at 13.4% compared to 12.7% in Brookings.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Saratoga springs at 20.8% compared to 18.7% in Brookings.
  • Brookings has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 13.2% in Saratoga springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Saratoga springs at 21.5% compared to 20.5% in Brookings.
  • Brookings has higher obesity rates at 34.2% compared to 28.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Saratoga springs at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Brookings.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Saratoga springs Brookings
No Schooling 0.7% (208) 0.2% (58)
High School Diploma 11.0% (3,147) 7.7% (1,837)
Less than High School 6.3% (1,801) 3.4% (822)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.3% (12,109) 23.1% (5,531)

Education Levels Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Brookings

  • A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Brookings.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga springs hold a high school diploma at 11.0% compared to 7.7% in Brookings.
  • More residents in Saratoga springs have less than a high school education at 6.3% compared to 3.4% in Brookings.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.3% compared to 23.1% in Brookings.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.