Demographics details for Sarasota, FL vs Sugar grove, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sarasota, FL vs Sugar grove, PA.
Data | Sarasota | Sugar grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,376 | 546 |
Median Age | 49.8 years | 42.2 years |
Median Income | $68,870 | $68,056 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sarasota vs Sugar grove
- In Sarasota, the population is higher at 57,376, compared to 546 in Sugar grove.
- Residents in Sarasota have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 42.2 years in Sugar grove.
- Sarasota has a higher median income of $68,870 compared to $68,056 in Sugar grove.
- In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 35.0% in Sarasota.
- Sarasota has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sugar grove.
- Sugar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.3% in Sarasota.
Demographics
Demographics Sarasota vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sarasota | Sugar grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 14 | 1 |
White | 60 | 79 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sarasota vs Sugar grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sarasota at 14% compared to 1% in Sugar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar grove at 79% compared to 60% in Sarasota.
- The Asian population is larger in Sarasota at 2% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sarasota at 15% compared to 6% in Sugar grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sugar grove at 14%, compared to 9% in Sarasota.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sarasota and Sugar grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sarasota | Sugar grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.2% |
Depression | 19.7% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 18.1% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 28.9% | 38.8% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sarasota vs Sugar grove
- In Sugar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.3% in Sarasota.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sugar grove at 23.5% versus 19.7% in Sarasota.
- Sugar grove has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 18.1% in Sarasota.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar grove at 18.2% compared to 17.0% in Sarasota.
- Sugar grove has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 28.9% in Sarasota.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sarasota at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Sugar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sarasota | Sugar grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (529) | 1.5% (8) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,677) | 28.2% (154) |
Less than High School | 10.9% (6,264) | 6.2% (34) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.5% (17,487) | 13.0% (71) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sarasota vs Sugar grove
- In Sugar grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.9% in Sarasota.
- In Sugar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.2% compared to 16.9% in Sarasota.
- More residents in Sarasota have less than a high school education at 10.9% compared to 6.2% in Sugar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sarasota hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 13.0% in Sugar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.