Demographics details for Sarasota, FL vs Jurupa valley, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sarasota, FL vs Jurupa valley, CA.

Data Sarasota Jurupa valley
Population 57,376 107,609
Median Age 49.8 years 33.5 years
Median Income $68,870 $91,562
Married Families 35.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 4.9

Population Comparison: Sarasota vs Jurupa valley

  • The population in Jurupa valley is higher at 107,609, compared to 57,376 in Sarasota.
  • Residents in Sarasota have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562, compared to $68,870 in Sarasota.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sarasota at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Jurupa valley at 12%, compared to 10% in Sarasota.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.3% in Sarasota.

Demographics

Demographics Sarasota vs Jurupa valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sarasota Jurupa valley
Black 14 3
White 60 8
Asian 2 4
Hispanic 15 71
Two or More Races 9 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sarasota vs Jurupa valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sarasota at 14% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
  • Sarasota has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
  • In Jurupa valley, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Sarasota.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 15% in Sarasota.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jurupa valley at 13%, compared to 9% in Sarasota.
  • In Jurupa valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sarasota.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sarasota Jurupa valley
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 13.3%
Depression 19.7% 17.4%
Smoking 18.1% 14.6%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 16.1%
Obesity 28.9% 38.4%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sarasota vs Jurupa valley

  • In Jurupa valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.3% in Sarasota.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sarasota at 19.7% compared to 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sarasota at 18.1% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sarasota at 17.0% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 28.9% in Sarasota.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sarasota at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sarasota Jurupa valley
No Schooling 0.9% (529) 3.1% (3,376)
High School Diploma 16.9% (9,677) 17.3% (18,582)
Less than High School 10.9% (6,264) 34.3% (36,892)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.5% (17,487) 9.0% (9,706)

Education Levels Comparison: Sarasota vs Jurupa valley

  • In Jurupa valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.9% in Sarasota.
  • In Jurupa valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 16.9% in Sarasota.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jurupa valley at 34.3%, compared to 10.9% in Sarasota.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sarasota hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.