Demographics details for Santa fe springs, CA vs Topsfield, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Santa fe springs, CA vs Topsfield, MA.

Data Santa fe springs Topsfield
Population 18,439 2,799
Median Age 38.0 years 39.8 years
Median Income $81,500 $156,250
Married Families 37.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.5 2.9

Population Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Topsfield

  • In Santa fe springs, the population is higher at 18,439, compared to 2,799 in Topsfield.
  • The median age in Topsfield is higher at 39.8 years, compared to 38.0 years in Santa fe springs.
  • Topsfield has a higher median income of $156,250, compared to $81,500 in Santa fe springs.
  • In Topsfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Topsfield.
  • The unemployment rate in Santa fe springs is higher at 5.5%, compared to 2.9% in Topsfield.

Demographics

Demographics Santa fe springs vs Topsfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Santa fe springs Topsfield
Black 4 2
White -5 74
Asian 8 3
Hispanic 75 8
Two or More Races 15 13
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Topsfield

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Santa fe springs at 4% compared to 2% in Topsfield.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Topsfield at 74% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Santa fe springs at 8% compared to 3% in Topsfield.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Santa fe springs at 75% compared to 8% in Topsfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Santa fe springs at 15% compared to 13% in Topsfield.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Santa fe springs at 3% compared to 0% in Topsfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Santa fe springs Topsfield
Mental Health Not Good 14.9% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 7.1%
Depression 15.1% 22.3%
Smoking 10.0% 9.0%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 19.4%
Obesity 30.9% 26.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Topsfield

  • More residents in Santa fe springs report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 14.2% in Topsfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Topsfield at 22.3% versus 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Santa fe springs at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Topsfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Topsfield at 19.4% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Santa fe springs at 30.9% compared to 26.1% in Topsfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Santa fe springs at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Topsfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Santa fe springs Topsfield
No Schooling 3.5% (644) 0.7% (19)
High School Diploma 16.3% (3,011) 6.4% (179)
Less than High School 26.5% (4,883) 4.9% (138)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.5% (2,850) 44.6% (1,249)

Education Levels Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Topsfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.7% in Topsfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 6.4% in Topsfield.
  • More residents in Santa fe springs have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 4.9% in Topsfield.
  • In Topsfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 15.5% in Santa fe springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.