Demographics details for Santa fe springs, CA vs Pewamo, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Santa fe springs, CA vs Pewamo, MI.

Data Santa fe springs Pewamo
Population 18,439 519
Median Age 38.0 years 34.2 years
Median Income $81,500 $70,938
Married Families 37.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% 4%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Pewamo

  • In Santa fe springs, the population is higher at 18,439, compared to 519 in Pewamo.
  • Residents in Santa fe springs have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 34.2 years in Pewamo.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500 compared to $70,938 in Pewamo.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Santa fe springs at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Pewamo.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Pewamo.
  • The unemployment rate in Santa fe springs is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in Pewamo.

Demographics

Demographics Santa fe springs vs Pewamo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Santa fe springs Pewamo
Black 4 Data is updating
White -5 95
Asian 8 Data is updating
Hispanic 75 2
Two or More Races 15 2
American Indian 3 1

Demographics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Pewamo

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Santa fe springs at 4% compared to 0% in Pewamo.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pewamo at 95% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Santa fe springs at 8% compared to 0% in Pewamo.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Santa fe springs at 75% compared to 2% in Pewamo.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Santa fe springs at 15% compared to 2% in Pewamo.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Santa fe springs at 3% compared to 1% in Pewamo.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Santa fe springs Pewamo
Mental Health Not Good 14.9% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 12.2%
Depression 15.1% 25.2%
Smoking 10.0% 22.2%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 18.5%
Obesity 30.9% 36.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Pewamo

  • In Pewamo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pewamo at 25.2% versus 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
  • Pewamo has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pewamo at 18.5% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
  • Pewamo has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pewamo at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Santa fe springs Pewamo
No Schooling 3.5% (644) 0.8% (4)
High School Diploma 16.3% (3,011) 23.3% (121)
Less than High School 26.5% (4,883) 9.2% (48)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.5% (2,850) 10.0% (52)

Education Levels Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Pewamo

  • A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.8% in Pewamo.
  • In Pewamo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.3% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
  • More residents in Santa fe springs have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 9.2% in Pewamo.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 10.0% in Pewamo.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.