Demographics details for Santa fe springs, CA vs Moorhead, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Santa fe springs, CA vs Moorhead, MN.
| Data | Santa fe springs | Moorhead |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,439 | 44,861 |
| Median Age | 38.0 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $81,500 | $68,680 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Moorhead
- The population in Moorhead is higher at 44,861, compared to 18,439 in Santa fe springs.
- Residents in Santa fe springs have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 31.0 years in Moorhead.
- Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500 compared to $68,680 in Moorhead.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Santa fe springs at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Moorhead.
- Santa fe springs has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Moorhead.
- The unemployment rate in Santa fe springs is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.0% in Moorhead.
Demographics
Demographics Santa fe springs vs Moorhead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Santa fe springs | Moorhead |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 6 |
| White | -5 | 81 |
| Asian | 8 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 75 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Moorhead
- In Moorhead, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Santa fe springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Moorhead at 81% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Santa fe springs at 8% compared to 2% in Moorhead.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Santa fe springs at 75% compared to 5% in Moorhead.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Santa fe springs at 15% compared to 5% in Moorhead.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Santa fe springs at 3% compared to 1% in Moorhead.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Santa fe springs | Moorhead |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 15.1% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Moorhead
- In Moorhead, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Moorhead at 26.5% versus 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
- Moorhead has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moorhead at 19.0% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
- Moorhead has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Moorhead at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Santa fe springs | Moorhead |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.5% (644) | 0.6% (250) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (3,011) | 10.0% (4,508) |
| Less than High School | 26.5% (4,883) | 6.0% (2,686) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (2,850) | 22.9% (10,291) |
Education Levels Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Moorhead
- A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.6% in Moorhead.
- A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 10.0% in Moorhead.
- More residents in Santa fe springs have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 6.0% in Moorhead.
- In Moorhead, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 15.5% in Santa fe springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.