Demographics details for Santa fe springs, CA vs Fancy farm, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Santa fe springs, CA vs Fancy farm, KY.
Data | Santa fe springs | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,439 | 300 |
Median Age | 38.0 years | 51.1 years |
Median Income | $81,500 | $55,060 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Fancy farm
- In Santa fe springs, the population is higher at 18,439, compared to 300 in Fancy farm.
- The median age in Fancy farm is higher at 51.1 years, compared to 38.0 years in Santa fe springs.
- Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500 compared to $55,060 in Fancy farm.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Santa fe springs at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Fancy farm.
- The poverty level is identical in both Santa fe springs and Fancy farm at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Santa fe springs is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.2% in Fancy farm.
Demographics
Demographics Santa fe springs vs Fancy farm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Santa fe springs | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 3 |
White | -5 | 91 |
Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 75 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 15 | 6 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Fancy farm
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Santa fe springs at 4% compared to 3% in Fancy farm.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fancy farm at 91% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Santa fe springs at 8% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Santa fe springs at 75% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Santa fe springs at 15% compared to 6% in Fancy farm.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Santa fe springs at 3% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Santa fe springs | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 12.6% |
Depression | 15.1% | 27.3% |
Smoking | 10.0% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 30.9% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Fancy farm
- In Fancy farm, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fancy farm at 27.3% versus 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
- Fancy farm has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fancy farm at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
- Fancy farm has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fancy farm at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Santa fe springs | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.5% (644) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (3,011) | 47.7% (143) |
Less than High School | 26.5% (4,883) | 5.3% (16) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (2,850) | 14.3% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Fancy farm
- A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Fancy farm.
- In Fancy farm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 47.7% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
- More residents in Santa fe springs have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 5.3% in Fancy farm.
- A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 14.3% in Fancy farm.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.