Demographics details for Santa fe springs, CA vs Centralia, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Santa fe springs, CA vs Centralia, IL.

Data Santa fe springs Centralia
Population 18,439 11,931
Median Age 38.0 years 40.7 years
Median Income $81,500 $46,468
Married Families 37.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Centralia

  • In Santa fe springs, the population is higher at 18,439, compared to 11,931 in Centralia.
  • The median age in Centralia is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 38.0 years in Santa fe springs.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Santa fe springs at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 12%, compared to 10% in Santa fe springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Santa fe springs is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.5% in Centralia.

Demographics

Demographics Santa fe springs vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Santa fe springs Centralia
Black 4 10
White -5 79
Asian 8 2
Hispanic 75 4
Two or More Races 15 5
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 4% in Santa fe springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Centralia at 79% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Santa fe springs at 8% compared to 2% in Centralia.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Santa fe springs at 75% compared to 4% in Centralia.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Santa fe springs at 15% compared to 5% in Centralia.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Santa fe springs at 3% compared to 0% in Centralia.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Santa fe springs Centralia
Mental Health Not Good 14.9% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 13.8%
Depression 15.1% 23.9%
Smoking 10.0% 22.7%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 16.4%
Obesity 30.9% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
  • Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Centralia at 16.4% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
  • Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Santa fe springs Centralia
No Schooling 3.5% (644) 0.6% (72)
High School Diploma 16.3% (3,011) 18.8% (2,243)
Less than High School 26.5% (4,883) 13.7% (1,638)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.5% (2,850) 12.5% (1,494)

Education Levels Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Centralia

  • A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.6% in Centralia.
  • In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
  • More residents in Santa fe springs have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 13.7% in Centralia.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.