Demographics details for Santa fe springs, CA vs Carroll, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Santa fe springs, CA vs Carroll, IA.

Data Santa fe springs Carroll
Population 18,439 10,184
Median Age 38.0 years 43.7 years
Median Income $81,500 $60,368
Married Families 37.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Carroll

  • In Santa fe springs, the population is higher at 18,439, compared to 10,184 in Carroll.
  • The median age in Carroll is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 38.0 years in Santa fe springs.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500 compared to $60,368 in Carroll.
  • In Carroll, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Santa fe springs and Carroll at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate in Santa fe springs is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in Carroll.

Demographics

Demographics Santa fe springs vs Carroll provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Santa fe springs Carroll
Black 4 2
White -5 91
Asian 8 1
Hispanic 75 4
Two or More Races 15 2
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Carroll

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Santa fe springs at 4% compared to 2% in Carroll.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Carroll at 91% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Santa fe springs at 8% compared to 1% in Carroll.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Santa fe springs at 75% compared to 4% in Carroll.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Santa fe springs at 15% compared to 2% in Carroll.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Santa fe springs at 3% compared to 0% in Carroll.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Santa fe springs Carroll
Mental Health Not Good 14.9% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 9.8%
Depression 15.1% 19.3%
Smoking 10.0% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 21.7%
Obesity 30.9% 39.0%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Carroll

  • In Carroll, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Carroll at 19.3% versus 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
  • Carroll has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Carroll at 21.7% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
  • Carroll has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carroll at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Santa fe springs Carroll
No Schooling 3.5% (644) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.3% (3,011) 22.7% (2,316)
Less than High School 26.5% (4,883) 7.3% (742)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.5% (2,850) 17.3% (1,763)

Education Levels Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Carroll

  • A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Carroll.
  • In Carroll, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.7% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
  • More residents in Santa fe springs have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 7.3% in Carroll.
  • In Carroll, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 15.5% in Santa fe springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.