Demographics details for Santa fe springs, CA vs Aberdeen, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Santa fe springs, CA vs Aberdeen, MS.
| Data | Santa fe springs | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,439 | 4,848 |
| Median Age | 38.0 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $81,500 | $46,788 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Aberdeen
- In Santa fe springs, the population is higher at 18,439, compared to 4,848 in Aberdeen.
- The median age in Aberdeen is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 38.0 years in Santa fe springs.
- Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500 compared to $46,788 in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Santa fe springs at 37.0% compared to 30.0% in Aberdeen.
- The poverty level is higher in Aberdeen at 22%, compared to 10% in Santa fe springs.
- The unemployment rate in Santa fe springs is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.4% in Aberdeen.
Demographics
Demographics Santa fe springs vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Santa fe springs | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 76 |
| White | -5 | 24 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 75 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 15 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 76% compared to 4% in Santa fe springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Aberdeen at 24% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Santa fe springs at 8% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Santa fe springs at 75% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Santa fe springs at 15% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Santa fe springs at 3% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Santa fe springs | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 15.1% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Aberdeen at 20.7% versus 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
- Aberdeen has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Santa fe springs at 15.7% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aberdeen at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Santa fe springs | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.5% (644) | 0.3% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (3,011) | 27.7% (1,341) |
| Less than High School | 26.5% (4,883) | 17.0% (822) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (2,850) | 8.7% (424) |
Education Levels Comparison: Santa fe springs vs Aberdeen
- A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.3% in Aberdeen.
- In Aberdeen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.7% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
- More residents in Santa fe springs have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 17.0% in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Santa fe springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 8.7% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.