Demographics details for Sanger, CA vs Yadkinville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanger, CA vs Yadkinville, NC.
Data | Sanger | Yadkinville |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,600 | 2,997 |
Median Age | 31.8 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $69,333 | $41,148 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanger vs Yadkinville
- In Sanger, the population is higher at 26,600, compared to 2,997 in Yadkinville.
- The median age in Yadkinville is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 31.8 years in Sanger.
- Sanger has a higher median income of $69,333 compared to $41,148 in Yadkinville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sanger at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Yadkinville.
- Sanger has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Yadkinville.
- The unemployment rate in Sanger is higher at 8.2%, compared to 4.5% in Yadkinville.
Demographics
Demographics Sanger vs Yadkinville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sanger | Yadkinville |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 8 |
White | 3 | 60 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 77 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 7 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanger vs Yadkinville
- In Yadkinville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Sanger.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Yadkinville at 60% compared to 3% in Sanger.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanger at 3% compared to 0% in Yadkinville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanger at 77% compared to 25% in Yadkinville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanger at 15% compared to 7% in Yadkinville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sanger at 2% compared to 0% in Yadkinville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sanger | Yadkinville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 11.8% |
Depression | 17.2% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 40.2% | 36.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanger vs Yadkinville
- More residents in Sanger report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.5% in Yadkinville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Yadkinville at 23.9% versus 17.2% in Sanger.
- Yadkinville has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 14.7% in Sanger.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Yadkinville at 17.2% compared to 13.8% in Sanger.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanger at 40.2% compared to 36.8% in Yadkinville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yadkinville at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Sanger.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sanger | Yadkinville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.9% (768) | 1.5% (44) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (3,599) | 23.9% (715) |
Less than High School | 32.2% (8,575) | 17.5% (523) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (2,067) | 8.1% (242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanger vs Yadkinville
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanger have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.5% in Yadkinville.
- In Yadkinville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 13.5% in Sanger.
- More residents in Sanger have less than a high school education at 32.2% compared to 17.5% in Yadkinville.
- In Yadkinville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.1% compared to 7.8% in Sanger.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.