Demographics details for Sanger, CA vs Spotsylvania, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanger, CA vs Spotsylvania, VA.
| Data | Sanger | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,600 | 146,688 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $69,333 | $105,068 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sanger vs Spotsylvania
- The population in Spotsylvania is higher at 146,688, compared to 26,600 in Sanger.
- The median age in Spotsylvania is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 31.8 years in Sanger.
- Spotsylvania has a higher median income of $105,068, compared to $69,333 in Sanger.
- In Spotsylvania, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sanger.
- Sanger has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 5% in Spotsylvania.
- The unemployment rate in Sanger is higher at 8.2%, compared to 3.2% in Spotsylvania.
Demographics
Demographics Sanger vs Spotsylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanger | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 16 |
| White | 3 | 63 |
| Asian | 3 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 77 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanger vs Spotsylvania
- In Spotsylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 0% in Sanger.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spotsylvania at 63% compared to 3% in Sanger.
- Both Sanger and Spotsylvania have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanger at 77% compared to 11% in Spotsylvania.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanger at 15% compared to 7% in Spotsylvania.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sanger at 2% compared to 0% in Spotsylvania.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanger | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 17.2% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanger vs Spotsylvania
- More residents in Sanger report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.5% in Spotsylvania.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spotsylvania at 21.8% versus 17.2% in Sanger.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanger at 14.7% compared to 13.7% in Spotsylvania.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spotsylvania at 17.1% compared to 13.8% in Sanger.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanger at 40.2% compared to 35.9% in Spotsylvania.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sanger at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Spotsylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanger | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (768) | 0.9% (1,297) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (3,599) | 15.5% (22,702) |
| Less than High School | 32.2% (8,575) | 10.2% (14,913) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (2,067) | 21.4% (31,461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanger vs Spotsylvania
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanger have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.9% in Spotsylvania.
- In Spotsylvania, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 13.5% in Sanger.
- More residents in Sanger have less than a high school education at 32.2% compared to 10.2% in Spotsylvania.
- In Spotsylvania, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 7.8% in Sanger.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.