Demographics details for Sanger, CA vs Reading, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanger, CA vs Reading, PA.
| Data | Sanger | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,600 | 94,858 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 31.1 years |
| Median Income | $69,333 | $42,852 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Sanger vs Reading
- The population in Reading is higher at 94,858, compared to 26,600 in Sanger.
- Residents in Sanger have a higher median age of 31.8 years compared to 31.1 years in Reading.
- Sanger has a higher median income of $69,333 compared to $42,852 in Reading.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sanger at 34.0% compared to 22.0% in Reading.
- The poverty level is higher in Reading at 25%, compared to 16% in Sanger.
- The unemployment rate in Sanger is higher at 8.2%, compared to 5.2% in Reading.
Demographics
Demographics Sanger vs Reading provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanger | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 11 |
| White | 3 | 60 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 77 | 67 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 21 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanger vs Reading
- In Reading, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Sanger.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Reading at 60% compared to 3% in Sanger.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanger at 3% compared to 1% in Reading.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanger at 77% compared to 67% in Reading.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Reading at 21%, compared to 15% in Sanger.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sanger at 2% compared to 1% in Reading.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanger | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 18.1% |
| Depression | 17.2% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 26.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 44.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanger vs Reading
- In Reading, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.5% in Sanger.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Reading at 23.1% versus 17.2% in Sanger.
- Reading has a higher smoking rate at 26.5% compared to 14.7% in Sanger.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanger at 13.8% compared to 13.0% in Reading.
- Reading has higher obesity rates at 44.7% compared to 40.2% in Sanger.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Reading at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Sanger.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanger | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (768) | 2.6% (2,442) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (3,599) | 17.8% (16,896) |
| Less than High School | 32.2% (8,575) | 32.2% (30,522) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (2,067) | 6.9% (6,512) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanger vs Reading
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanger have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 2.6% in Reading.
- In Reading, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 13.5% in Sanger.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 32.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanger hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.8% compared to 6.9% in Reading.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.