Demographics details for Sanger, CA vs Pittsford, VT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanger, CA vs Pittsford, VT.
| Data | Sanger | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,600 | 2,807 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $69,333 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 1.7 |
Population Comparison: Sanger vs Pittsford
- In Sanger, the population is higher at 26,600, compared to 2,807 in Pittsford.
- The median age in Pittsford is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 31.8 years in Sanger.
- Sanger has a higher median income of $69,333 compared to $65,000 in Pittsford.
- In Pittsford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sanger.
- Sanger has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 5% in Pittsford.
- The unemployment rate in Sanger is higher at 8.2%, compared to 1.7% in Pittsford.
Demographics
Demographics Sanger vs Pittsford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanger | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 3 | 97 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 77 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanger vs Pittsford
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sanger and Pittsford at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsford at 97% compared to 3% in Sanger.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanger at 3% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanger at 77% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanger at 15% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sanger at 2% compared to 0% in Pittsford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanger | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 17.2% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanger vs Pittsford
- More residents in Sanger report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sanger at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanger at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanger at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanger at 40.2% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sanger at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanger | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (768) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (3,599) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 32.2% (8,575) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (2,067) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanger vs Pittsford
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanger have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanger hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- More residents in Sanger have less than a high school education at 32.2% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanger hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.