Demographics details for Sanford, NC vs South haven, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, NC vs South haven, MI.
| Data | Sanford | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,224 | 3,988 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 61.0 years |
| Median Income | $52,951 | $63,202 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs South haven
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 31,224, compared to 3,988 in South haven.
- The median age in South haven is higher at 61.0 years, compared to 34.6 years in Sanford.
- South haven has a higher median income of $63,202, compared to $52,951 in Sanford.
- In South haven, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in South haven.
- The unemployment rate in Sanford is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in South haven.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs South haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 11 |
| White | 34 | 74 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs South haven
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 25% compared to 11% in South haven.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South haven at 74% compared to 34% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 2% compared to 1% in South haven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 29% compared to 6% in South haven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 10% compared to 7% in South haven.
- In South haven, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sanford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs South haven
- More residents in Sanford report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South haven at 24.3% versus 23.2% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 18.8% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South haven at 18.0% compared to 15.3% in Sanford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 41.1% compared to 35.6% in South haven.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South haven at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (443) | 1.2% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (3,909) | 16.0% (638) |
| Less than High School | 22.6% (7,052) | 11.5% (457) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (4,025) | 32.1% (1,279) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs South haven
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in South haven.
- In South haven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 12.5% in Sanford.
- More residents in Sanford have less than a high school education at 22.6% compared to 11.5% in South haven.
- In South haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 12.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.