Demographics details for Sanford, NC vs Siloam springs, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, NC vs Siloam springs, AR.
| Data | Sanford | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,224 | 18,654 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $52,951 | $59,911 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Siloam springs
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 31,224, compared to 18,654 in Siloam springs.
- Residents in Sanford have a higher median age of 34.6 years compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911, compared to $52,951 in Sanford.
- In Siloam springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sanford.
- The poverty level is identical in both Sanford and Siloam springs at 13%.
- The unemployment rate in Sanford is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Siloam springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 1 |
| White | 34 | 50 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Siloam springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 25% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Siloam springs at 50% compared to 34% in Sanford.
- In Siloam springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Sanford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 29% compared to 23% in Siloam springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Siloam springs at 20%, compared to 10% in Sanford.
- In Siloam springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Sanford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Siloam springs
- In Siloam springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.4% in Sanford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Siloam springs at 26.0% versus 23.2% in Sanford.
- Siloam springs has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 18.8% in Sanford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanford at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 41.1% compared to 39.2% in Siloam springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sanford at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (443) | 3.7% (681) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (3,909) | 13.5% (2,510) |
| Less than High School | 22.6% (7,052) | 17.4% (3,249) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (4,025) | 14.4% (2,680) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Siloam springs
- In Siloam springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.4% in Sanford.
- In Siloam springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 12.5% in Sanford.
- More residents in Sanford have less than a high school education at 22.6% compared to 17.4% in Siloam springs.
- In Siloam springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 12.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.