Demographics details for Sanford, NC vs Keiser, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, NC vs Keiser, AR.
| Data | Sanford | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,224 | 713 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $52,951 | $50,136 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Keiser
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 31,224, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- The median age in Keiser is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 34.6 years in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher median income of $52,951 compared to $50,136 in Keiser.
- In Keiser, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Keiser.
- The unemployment rate in Sanford is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Keiser.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Keiser provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 4 |
| White | 34 | 83 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Keiser
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 25% compared to 4% in Keiser.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keiser at 83% compared to 34% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 2% compared to 0% in Keiser.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 29% compared to 1% in Keiser.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keiser at 12%, compared to 10% in Sanford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanford and Keiser at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 24.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Keiser
- In Keiser, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.4% in Sanford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keiser at 28.9% versus 23.2% in Sanford.
- Keiser has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 18.8% in Sanford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanford at 15.3% compared to 15.2% in Keiser.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 41.1% compared to 34.9% in Keiser.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 14.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (443) | 6.2% (44) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (3,909) | 15.0% (107) |
| Less than High School | 22.6% (7,052) | 55.5% (396) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (4,025) | 7.3% (52) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Keiser
- In Keiser, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 1.4% in Sanford.
- In Keiser, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 12.5% in Sanford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keiser at 55.5%, compared to 22.6% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.