Demographics details for Sanford, NC vs Diamond springs, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, NC vs Diamond springs, CA.
| Data | Sanford | Diamond springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,224 | 12,197 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $52,951 | $71,279 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Diamond springs
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 31,224, compared to 12,197 in Diamond springs.
- The median age in Diamond springs is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 34.6 years in Sanford.
- Diamond springs has a higher median income of $71,279, compared to $52,951 in Sanford.
- In Diamond springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Diamond springs.
- The unemployment rate in Sanford is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.2% in Diamond springs.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Diamond springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Diamond springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | Data is updating |
| White | 34 | 72 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Diamond springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 25% compared to 0% in Diamond springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Diamond springs at 72% compared to 34% in Sanford.
- In Diamond springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Sanford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 29% compared to 18% in Diamond springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 10% compared to 6% in Diamond springs.
- In Diamond springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sanford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Diamond springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 29.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Diamond springs
- More residents in Sanford report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.7% in Diamond springs.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 23.2%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 18.8% compared to 12.7% in Diamond springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Diamond springs at 19.0% compared to 15.3% in Sanford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 41.1% compared to 29.1% in Diamond springs.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Sanford and Diamond springs at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Diamond springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (443) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (3,909) | 17.2% (2,093) |
| Less than High School | 22.6% (7,052) | 5.8% (711) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (4,025) | 18.6% (2,271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Diamond springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Diamond springs.
- In Diamond springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 12.5% in Sanford.
- More residents in Sanford have less than a high school education at 22.6% compared to 5.8% in Diamond springs.
- In Diamond springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 12.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.