Demographics details for Sanford, NC vs Averill park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, NC vs Averill park, NY.
| Data | Sanford | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,224 | 1,608 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 53.3 years |
| Median Income | $52,951 | $109,746 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Averill park
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 31,224, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
- The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 34.6 years in Sanford.
- Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $52,951 in Sanford.
- In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 4% in Averill park.
- The unemployment rate in Sanford is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Averill park.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | Data is updating |
| White | 34 | 100 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Averill park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 25% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 34% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 2% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 29% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 10% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanford and Averill park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 15.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Averill park
- More residents in Sanford report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Averill park at 23.7% versus 23.2% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 18.8% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 15.3% in Sanford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 41.1% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Sanford and Averill park at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (443) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (3,909) | 22.0% (354) |
| Less than High School | 22.6% (7,052) | 3.7% (60) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (4,025) | 32.3% (520) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Averill park
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
- In Averill park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 12.5% in Sanford.
- More residents in Sanford have less than a high school education at 22.6% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
- In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 12.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.