Demographics details for Sanford, ME vs Goleta, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, ME vs Goleta, CA.
| Data | Sanford | Goleta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,266 | 32,432 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $71,848 | $113,889 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Goleta
- The population in Goleta is higher at 32,432, compared to 22,266 in Sanford.
- Residents in Sanford have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 35.0 years in Goleta.
- Goleta has a higher median income of $113,889, compared to $71,848 in Sanford.
- In Goleta, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Sanford.
- The poverty level is identical in both Sanford and Goleta at 8%.
- Goleta has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.7% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Goleta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Goleta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 89 | 34 |
| Asian | 2 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Goleta
- In Goleta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 34% in Goleta.
- In Goleta, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Sanford.
- Goleta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 3% in Sanford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Goleta at 14%, compared to 5% in Sanford.
- In Goleta, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sanford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Goleta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 18.1% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 33.4% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Goleta
- More residents in Sanford report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.9% in Goleta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sanford at 25.3% compared to 18.1% in Goleta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 18.4% compared to 9.8% in Goleta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanford at 18.2% compared to 17.0% in Goleta.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 33.4% compared to 26.7% in Goleta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sanford at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Goleta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Goleta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (79) | 2.6% (836) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,797) | 7.0% (2,263) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (2,692) | 15.7% (5,090) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (3,505) | 32.6% (10,582) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Goleta
- In Goleta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.4% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 7.0% in Goleta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Goleta at 15.7%, compared to 12.1% in Sanford.
- In Goleta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.6% compared to 15.7% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.