Demographics details for Sanford, ME vs Clayton, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, ME vs Clayton, NY.
| Data | Sanford | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,266 | 4,781 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $71,848 | $74,471 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Clayton
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 22,266, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 39.3 years in Sanford.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $74,471, compared to $71,848 in Sanford.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 36.0% in Sanford.
- The poverty level is higher in Clayton at 10%, compared to 8% in Sanford.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.7% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 95 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 1% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 95% compared to 89% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 2% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 3% compared to 1% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 5% compared to 4% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanford and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 33.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Clayton
- More residents in Sanford report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sanford at 25.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanford at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 33.4% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sanford at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (79) | 0.1% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (4,797) | 18.3% (874) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (2,692) | 14.2% (679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (3,505) | 20.6% (983) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 18.3% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 14.2%, compared to 12.1% in Sanford.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 15.7% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.