Demographics details for Sanford, FL vs Weyers cave, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, FL vs Weyers cave, VA.
| Data | Sanford | Weyers cave |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,154 | 2,212 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 26.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,181 | $93,384 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Weyers cave
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 63,154, compared to 2,212 in Weyers cave.
- Residents in Sanford have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 26.6 years in Weyers cave.
- Weyers cave has a higher median income of $93,384, compared to $59,181 in Sanford.
- In Weyers cave, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 31.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Weyers cave.
- The unemployment rate in Sanford is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.5% in Weyers cave.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Weyers cave provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Weyers cave |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | 7 |
| White | 31 | 80 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Weyers cave
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 26% compared to 7% in Weyers cave.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Weyers cave at 80% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 4% compared to 0% in Weyers cave.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 26% compared to 8% in Weyers cave.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 13% compared to 5% in Weyers cave.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanford and Weyers cave at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Weyers cave |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Weyers cave
- More residents in Sanford report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.2% in Weyers cave.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Weyers cave at 23.6% versus 18.9% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 19.9% compared to 14.8% in Weyers cave.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Weyers cave at 18.6% compared to 15.9% in Sanford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 34.4% compared to 34.2% in Weyers cave.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sanford at 11.0% compared to 4.0% in Weyers cave.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Weyers cave |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (389) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (11,984) | 15.5% (342) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (7,010) | 3.0% (66) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (10,683) | 26.2% (580) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Weyers cave
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Weyers cave.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 15.5% in Weyers cave.
- More residents in Sanford have less than a high school education at 11.1% compared to 3.0% in Weyers cave.
- In Weyers cave, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 16.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.