Demographics details for Sanford, FL vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, FL vs South jordan, UT.
| Data | Sanford | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,154 | 83,513 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $59,181 | $119,822 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 63,154 in Sanford.
- Residents in Sanford have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $59,181 in Sanford.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 31.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Sanford is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | Data is updating |
| White | 31 | 83 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 26% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- Both Sanford and South jordan have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 26% compared to 7% in South jordan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 13% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sanford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.5% in Sanford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 18.9% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 19.9% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 15.9% in Sanford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 34.4% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sanford at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (389) | 0.2% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (11,984) | 8.4% (6,995) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (7,010) | 2.7% (2,236) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (10,683) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Sanford have less than a high school education at 11.1% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 16.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.