Demographics details for Sanford, FL vs Mc graw, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, FL vs Mc graw, NY.
| Data | Sanford | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,154 | 994 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,181 | $60,781 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Mc graw
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 63,154, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- Residents in Sanford have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781, compared to $59,181 in Sanford.
- In Mc graw, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Mc graw.
- The unemployment rate in Sanford is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Mc graw.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Mc graw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | Data is updating |
| White | 31 | 88 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 26% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mc graw at 88% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 4% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 26% compared to 4% in Mc graw.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 13% compared to 8% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanford and Mc graw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Mc graw
- More residents in Sanford report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.2% in Mc graw.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mc graw at 25.5% versus 18.9% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 19.9% compared to 18.6% in Mc graw.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mc graw at 19.1% compared to 15.9% in Sanford.
- Mc graw has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 34.4% in Sanford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mc graw at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (389) | 0.3% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (11,984) | 27.1% (269) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (7,010) | 15.1% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (10,683) | 8.8% (87) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Mc graw.
- In Mc graw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 19.0% in Sanford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc graw at 15.1%, compared to 11.1% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.