Demographics details for Sanford, FL vs Farmington, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, FL vs Farmington, NM.
| Data | Sanford | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,154 | 46,127 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $59,181 | $61,388 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Farmington
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 63,154, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
- The median age in Farmington is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 35.6 years in Sanford.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388, compared to $59,181 in Sanford.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | 1 |
| White | 31 | 32 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 29 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 26% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 32% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 4% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Sanford and Farmington at 26%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 13% compared to 11% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 29%, compared to 0% in Sanford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Farmington
- In Farmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.5% in Sanford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 20.1% versus 18.9% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 19.9% compared to 18.2% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanford at 15.9% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 34.4%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (389) | 0.5% (211) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (11,984) | 13.4% (6,180) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (7,010) | 12.9% (5,929) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (10,683) | 13.0% (5,985) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmington at 12.9%, compared to 11.1% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.