Demographics details for Sanford, FL vs Drakesboro, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, FL vs Drakesboro, KY.
Data | Sanford | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 63,154 | 474 |
Median Age | 35.6 years | 42.7 years |
Median Income | $59,181 | $39,659 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Drakesboro
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 63,154, compared to 474 in Drakesboro.
- The median age in Drakesboro is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 35.6 years in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher median income of $59,181 compared to $39,659 in Drakesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sanford at 31.0% compared to 28.0% in Drakesboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Drakesboro at 15%, compared to 12% in Sanford.
- Drakesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Drakesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sanford | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 26 | 9 |
White | 31 | 83 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 26 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Drakesboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 26% compared to 9% in Drakesboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Drakesboro at 83% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 4% compared to 0% in Drakesboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 26% compared to 7% in Drakesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 13% compared to 1% in Drakesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanford and Drakesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sanford | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 21.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 17.1% |
Depression | 18.9% | 29.5% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 27.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 43.3% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 16.5% in Sanford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Drakesboro at 29.5% versus 18.9% in Sanford.
- Drakesboro has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 19.9% in Sanford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanford at 15.9% compared to 13.8% in Drakesboro.
- Drakesboro has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 34.4% in Sanford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Drakesboro at 27.0% compared to 11.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sanford | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (389) | 1.7% (8) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (11,984) | 28.7% (136) |
Less than High School | 11.1% (7,010) | 28.3% (134) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (10,683) | 0.8% (4) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Sanford.
- In Drakesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 19.0% in Sanford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Drakesboro at 28.3%, compared to 11.1% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 0.8% in Drakesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.