Demographics details for Sanford, FL vs Crystal lake, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, FL vs Crystal lake, IL.
| Data | Sanford | Crystal lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,154 | 40,661 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $59,181 | $103,018 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Crystal lake
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 63,154, compared to 40,661 in Crystal lake.
- The median age in Crystal lake is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 35.6 years in Sanford.
- Crystal lake has a higher median income of $103,018, compared to $59,181 in Sanford.
- In Crystal lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 31.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Crystal lake.
- Crystal lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.0% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Crystal lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Crystal lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | 1 |
| White | 31 | 79 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Crystal lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 26% compared to 1% in Crystal lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crystal lake at 79% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- Both Sanford and Crystal lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 26% compared to 11% in Crystal lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 13% compared to 5% in Crystal lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanford and Crystal lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Crystal lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Crystal lake
- More residents in Sanford report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.0% in Crystal lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crystal lake at 19.6% versus 18.9% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 19.9% compared to 12.3% in Crystal lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crystal lake at 18.9% compared to 15.9% in Sanford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanford at 34.4% compared to 29.5% in Crystal lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sanford at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Crystal lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Crystal lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (389) | 0.2% (95) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (11,984) | 13.8% (5,614) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (7,010) | 5.8% (2,362) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (10,683) | 27.1% (11,028) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Crystal lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Crystal lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 13.8% in Crystal lake.
- More residents in Sanford have less than a high school education at 11.1% compared to 5.8% in Crystal lake.
- In Crystal lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 16.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.