Demographics details for Sanford, FL vs Calamus, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, FL vs Calamus, IA.
| Data | Sanford | Calamus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,154 | 352 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,181 | $67,708 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Calamus
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 63,154, compared to 352 in Calamus.
- The median age in Calamus is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 35.6 years in Sanford.
- Calamus has a higher median income of $67,708, compared to $59,181 in Sanford.
- In Calamus, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 31.0% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Calamus.
- The unemployment rate in Sanford is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Calamus.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Calamus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Calamus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | Data is updating |
| White | 31 | 95 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Calamus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanford at 26% compared to 0% in Calamus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Calamus at 95% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 4% compared to 0% in Calamus.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 26% compared to 2% in Calamus.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 13% compared to 3% in Calamus.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanford and Calamus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Calamus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Calamus
- More residents in Sanford report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.8% in Calamus.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Calamus at 19.6% versus 18.9% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanford at 19.9% compared to 18.0% in Calamus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Calamus at 23.1% compared to 15.9% in Sanford.
- Calamus has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 34.4% in Sanford.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Sanford and Calamus at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Calamus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (389) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (11,984) | 27.6% (97) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (7,010) | 5.7% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (10,683) | 14.5% (51) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Calamus
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Calamus.
- In Calamus, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 19.0% in Sanford.
- More residents in Sanford have less than a high school education at 11.1% compared to 5.7% in Calamus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in Calamus.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.