Demographics details for Sandusky, OH vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sandusky, OH vs Meadville, PA.
Data | Sandusky | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,526 | 12,680 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $47,375 | $46,157 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Sandusky vs Meadville
- In Sandusky, the population is higher at 24,526, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in Sandusky have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Sandusky has a higher median income of $47,375 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sandusky at 28.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- Sandusky has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Meadville.
- The unemployment rate in Sandusky is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.0% in Meadville.
Demographics
Demographics Sandusky vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sandusky | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | 5 |
White | 62 | 86 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sandusky vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sandusky at 23% compared to 5% in Meadville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Meadville at 86% compared to 62% in Sandusky.
- Both Sandusky and Meadville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sandusky at 7% compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sandusky at 7% compared to 6% in Meadville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sandusky and Meadville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sandusky | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 14.0% |
Depression | 25.0% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 25.9% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 46.2% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sandusky vs Meadville
- More residents in Sandusky report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 19.2% in Meadville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 25.0% in Sandusky.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sandusky at 25.9% compared to 24.2% in Meadville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sandusky at 17.7% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sandusky at 46.2% compared to 41.5% in Meadville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Sandusky.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sandusky | Meadville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (204) | 0.2% (29) |
High School Diploma | 24.1% (5,915) | 24.5% (3,110) |
Less than High School | 14.3% (3,502) | 8.6% (1,085) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (3,314) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sandusky vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandusky have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 24.1% in Sandusky.
- More residents in Sandusky have less than a high school education at 14.3% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 13.5% in Sandusky.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.